ウィリアム・アックマン被告
今回の書人両断は傲慢極まりないハイエナファンドを率いる罪しかない男である。
マハトマ・ガンジーの説く七つの社会的罪のうち、「労働なき富」と「道徳なき商業」がこの男を厳しく断罪する。今回はこの二点で厳しくアックマンの悪事を批判しよう。
米2大アクティビストによる「10年戦争」
最終更新:2013年01月25日 11時35分
米2大アクティビストによる「10年戦争」、カール・アイカーン、ビル・アックマンの両氏による遺恨が再燃し、激しい火花を散らすことになった。
米2大アクティビストによる「10年戦争」、カール・アイカーン、ビル・アックマンの両氏による遺恨が再燃し、激しい火花を散らすことになった。
「ハーバライフについて、聖人ぶった態度を取っているが、それは言うべきではないし、陽の目を見ることになるのはわたしだろう。彼を批判するためにここ に来たわけではないが、アックマンは不誠実だ。彼のやっていることは、ヘッジファンドマネージャーの仕事ではない」などと痛烈に批判した。
アックマン氏とは反対のポジションを取っていることを示唆できる内容だが、人格を否定しかねないところまで発言したことで、反撃を呼んだ。
アックマン氏の運用会社パーシング・スクエアは直後に、この発言への反対意見を書面で発表したのだ。
「カール・アイカーンは良い投資家だが、わたしに言わせれば約束を守らない人間」とやり返したのだ。
2人の戦いは約10年前の2003年3月1日に遡る。アックマン氏の以前のヘッジファンド運用会社「Gotham Partners」について、ある約束を交わしていた。
ある保有株式をアイカーン氏に譲渡する取引で、そのプラミアムとして株主に利益の一部支払いをすることに同意していたという。しかし、アイカーン氏は利益を出したが支払いを拒否したために、司法の場で戦うことになった。
アックマン氏は「彼は友人になろうと言ってきたが、わたしは拒否してやった」としており、仲直りを拒否した。もう一度戦う運命にあったのかもしれない。
このアックマンの悪行、放置するわけにはいかない。
脱税を行えとバーガーキングなるハンバーガーチェーンをけしかけてカナダのチェーン店を買収させ本社をカナダに移転させる悪事を行ったほか、 アメリカの法人だったがカナダに本社を移して脱税を平然と行っている借金だらけのバリアントなる会社と共謀し、しわ取りで優れた技術を持つ製薬業のアラガンの違法な敵対的買収を画策する悪事を行った。
更にアラガンが乗っ取りに対抗すべく正当な企業買収を進めていることを妨害しようと以下の悪事まで行う。これを人は恐喝というのである。
アックマン氏、アラガン提訴と警告 サリックス買収なら
[23日 ロイター] - 米著名投資家ウィリアム・アックマン氏率いるファンドのパーシング・スクエア・ホールディングスは23日、しわ取り注射剤「ボトックス」などを手がける米製薬アラガン が同業のサリックス・ファーマシューティカルズ の買収に踏み切れば、アラガンを提訴する構えであることを明らかにした。
アラガンは、カナダの製薬大手バリアント・ファーマシューティカルズ からの敵対的買収を防ぐため、サリックス買収向けた交渉を進めている。アラガンの主要株主であるパーシングは、バリアントによるアラガンへの敵対的買収案を支持している。
アックマン氏はアラガン取締役会に宛てた書簡で、株主投票なしにサリックス買収に向けた動きを再開するのであれば、パーシングは信認義務違反でアラガンを提訴すると言明した。
アラガンは電子メールで声明を発表し、取締役会は引き続き、バリアントによる提案がアラガンの価値を著しく過小評価していると判断していると応じた。
ロイターは22日、アラガンがサリックスとの買収交渉を再開したと報じている。
パーシングは8月にも、アラガンを提訴。同社が敵対的買収防衛に向けた手段を模索するため時間を稼ごうと、バリアントの提案について協議する株主の特別会合を延期していると主張した。
アックマンの主張とやらには正当性がない。
なぜなら、アックマンはアラガンで働く従業員の存在を忘れて己の強欲しか頭にないのである。これをガンジーがもし仮に生きていれば公開大説教ものではないのか。
アックマンは恥を知るがいい。
It is a man not only sin led by the arrogant hyena fund this time.
Of the social sin of seven preach of Mahatma Gandhi, "Without commercial morality" and "wealth Without Labor" is severely condemned this man. Let's criticize the wrongs Ackman strictly at these two points this time.
The Full Story Of Why Ackman And Icahn Have Hated Each Other For A Decade
Ali Frazier Boxing
AP Images
Last time, though, he lost.
This time, who knows? When Ackman presented his dizzying takedown of Herbalife, a nutritional multi-level marketing company, last month, the Street was relatively quiet watching the stock through the holiday season.
Perhaps everyone was waiting for Herbalife to present it's side of the story today.
But even if they weren't, the quiet period may very well end now that Icahn's in the game.
The feud between Ackman and Icahn only ended in 2011 and dates back to 2004. One of the weirdest things about it? It was all over only $4.5 million.
In 2003 Bill Ackman's first hedge fund, Gotham Partners, had just blown up and he was being investigated by then-Attorney General Eliot Spitzer. The investigation was eventually dropped, but this definitely wasn't the best time in Ackman's career.
He needed to do a deal. Specifically, he wanted to sell Hallwood Realty, a company whose stock was trading about $60 a share but Ackman believed it was worth $140. So he called Icahn.
From the NYT:
“By reputation, I knew he was a tough guy
and a difficult guy,” Mr. Ackman says. “I wanted to make sure I could
collect.”He continues: “I insisted the agreement be short. I also
insisted it have a mathematical example in it, so that there could be no
question about the intent of the agreement.”
That’s not quite the way Mr. Icahn
remembers it. He says that he was the one who was worried, and that Mr.
Ackman was under investigation and desperate to sell. (Both
investigations were later dropped.)
“I checked him out,” Mr. Icahn says. “He
was in trouble with the S.E.C.; he had investors leaving him. A few of
my friends called me up and said; ‘Don’t deal with this guy.’ ”
Regardless, the two made a deal. Icahn bought shares of the company
from Ackman for $80 a share with the promise that if he sold the shares
and made a profit above 10% within the next three years they would split
it.To make sure everything was on the up and up, Ackman included some legal provisions in his contract with Icahn. First the contract stipulated that if there was any legal trouble, the loser would pay the winner's legal fees. Second it said that if payment was delayed, Icahn would owe Ackman a lot of interest.
In 2004, Hallwood merged with another company, for $137 a share. That meant Icahn made some good money on the deal, so Ackman called him for Gotham Partners' cut.
More from NYT:
As Mr. Ackman tells it, the older man
scoffed: “First off, I didn’t sell,” Mr. Icahn told him. Mr. Icahn
argued that a merger did not constitute a sale of shares.
“Well, do you still own the shares?” Mr. Ackman asked.
“No,” Mr. Icahn said. “But I didn’t sell.”
And so it went. Mr. Ackman threatened to sue. Mr. Icahn roared that he would counter sue.
“Go ahead, sue me. You know what, I’m
going to sue you!” Mr. Icahn shouted, according to Mr. Ackman, who says
Mr. Icahn told him that he took his advice on MBIA and lost $20 million.
So Ackman eventually sued, and while the men barely spoke (their
lawyers did all the talking) there was some name calling (from the NYT):
“The guy is a shakedown artist,” Mr. Ackman sneers. “His word is worthless.”
Mr. Icahn says: “He’s now the young
gunfighter who wants to show he beat the older gunfighter with a big
reputation. He just likes pounding himself on the chest.”
And there was an incident when the two men reportedly got into an
argument at a restaurant when Icahn offered to settle the dispute by
giving $10 million to the charity of Ackman's choice. Ackman said the
money belonged to Gotham Partners and refused.Then there was the time investor David Tisch asked Ackman about Icahn. Icahn wanted to invest in one of Tisch's funds and Ackman told him to think better of taking Icahn's money.
According to the NYT, though, Tisch and Icahn don't remember ever hammering out a formal offer for investment.
Meanwhile in Court, Icahn and Ackman's lawyers went to war for 7 years. Finally in October 2011, Icahn's final appeal was denied and Ackman was awarded $9 million.
However, to this day it's well known that Ackman and Icahn dislike each other. Even the New York Times Dining section has mentioned it. In a September 2012 piece about how NYC restaurant staffs accommodate their most loyal patients, this little gem appeared:
At Marea, Michael White’s Italian
restaurant on Central Park South, for instance, the hedge fund manager
William A. Ackman is a regular and one of many customers who rates an
NR, never refuse. What the computer does not say (but the general
manager, Rocky Cirino, knows) is that servers can never seat Mr. Ackman
next to Carl C. Icahn, another big Wall Street name. The two have sued each other.
Now it looks like Herbalife is the next battlefield for these two. Buckle up.It does not go misdeeds of this Ackman, to not standing.
In addition to carrying out the evil to be transferred to Canada headquarters to purchase the chain stores in Canada by incited the hamburger chain that is Burger King and perform the tax evasion, was a subsidiary of the United States, but debt has done calmly tax evasion by transferring its headquarters in Canada and conspired with the company that is a variant of the full, it was wrong to orchestrate illegal hostile takeover of Allergan pharmaceutical industry with superior technology in wrinkle.
Be carried out until the wickedness of the following tries to interfere with that is advancing the legitimate acquisitions Allergan is to counter to takeover more. Person is of that this blackmail.
Ackman again threatens to sue Allergan over potential Salix deal
Sept 23
Allergan is trying to seal a deal with Salix in order to stay independent and fend off a $53 billion hostile offer from Valeant Pharmaceuticals Inc . The Valeant offer is backed by Pershing Square - Allergan's largest shareholder with a 9.72 percent stake.
In a letter to Allergan's board on Tuesday, Ackman said Pershing Square would sue the company for breach of fiduciary duty if it resumed its attempts to buy Salix without a shareholder vote.
Reuters reported on Monday that Allergan had resumed talks to buy Salix.
Pershing Square has been threatening to sue Allergan for more than two months, with Ackman calling its attempts at acquisitions "desperate". (Reporting by Anjali Rao Koppala in Bangalore; Editing by Simon Jennings)
There is no validity to the alleged claim of Ackman.
Because there is no head of his own greed only to forget the presence of employees who work in Allergan him. Is it not large public preaching what Gandhi if alive if if this.
The Shame on you right now.